Dedicated Support on Your Paper Reviewer Comments
Are you upset and overwhelmed by reviewer comments on your research paper? Our research paper publishing services are here to support you in that.
What Makes Us Your No. 01 Choice
It is possible for the peer review process to go completely wrong or right. When done correctly, the results are satisfying. However, it becomes extremely unpleasant when something goes wrong, especially when addressing reviewers’ remarks. We are here to help you. We at Scopus Journal Publishers have over a decade of experience assisting with publishing research papers. We support you throughout the process, from revising and submitting the research paper to responding to reviewers’ feedback for peer review before publication.
Reviewer Comment Strategy
Reviewer Perspective Analysis
Conflicting Feedback Resolution
Resolution Substantive Response Editing
Response Structure Optimization
Conciseness Coaching
Revised Manuscript Review
Revision Roadmap
Evidence Integration
Clarity Enhancement
Scopus Journal Publishers has helped above 10,000 researchers and scholars in addressing reviewer’s comments! Get in touch with us!
Take A Look at How Our Reviewer Comments Support Works
Comment Evaluation:
Our journal publishing experts will perform a deep analysis of your reviewer comments to find out the best possible solution in addressing it.
Change Implementation:
Our team of premium editing services will understand the peer reviewers’ purpose and intent. Afterward, we will make the necessary changes accordingly.
Answering Peer Reviewers:
We will update your manuscript in a very professional and clear manner. During this process, we keep in mind that it won’t come back for revision again.
Get expert support from us with your reviewers' comments!
Take a View What Our Customers Think About Us
Frequently Asked Questions
Do you need the peer reviewer’s editor's name?
No, we don’t need the names of the peer reviewers’ editors. If you want to mention the names, it’s your choice; otherwise, it is not necessary.
What if the editor sent me only one reviewer's comments? Will you do that?
The reason is that sometimes your paper is reviewed by two reviewers, and sometimes, it is possible your paper will be examined by only one reviewer. The reason is that at a certain time, the editors won’t get the reviewers and perform the detailed analyses by themselves.
How can I deal with conflicting reviewer and editor comments?
It is common to deal with conflicting reviewer’s comments. You can have a call or arrange an online session with them to get the logic behind those peer review comments. Keep in mind you should give a solid reason for each of the comments; also, you can add in your cover letter to the editor that some comments are conflicting, and you have to choose from them, but you give an accurate reason for your choice.
Does a surprisingly fast peer review process suggest rejection?
There is no relationship between the result and the time taken to review. In general, peer reviewers take around 1 to 3 months to review. You can also check the publication website to know about the average peer review time.
Why does my revised paper not go for a second review?
Most often, the paper goes through to two peer reviewers but on certain occasions, it is possible that your paper is reviewed by only one reviewer.
